SCHD vs URA
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs Global X Uranium ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | URA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.69% | |
| AUM | $108.7B | $6.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.13% | 5.30% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 57 | |
| YTD Return | +26.54% | -2.45% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.90% | +20.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.29% | +32.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.65% | +24.24% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 37.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -93.5% | |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Nov 4, 2010 |
SCHD vs URA Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Global X Uranium ETF (URA) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year SCHD returned +30.90% while URA returned +20.61%. Year to date, SCHD is up 26.54% versus a loss of 2.45% for URA.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +16.29% per year against +32.55% for URA; over five years the annualized figures are +9.65% and +24.24% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.51% annualized vs -2.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
URA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.2% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -93.5% for URA. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while URA charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $69 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.13% against 5.30% for URA.
Holdings Overlap
SCHD and URA share 0 holdings out of 145 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or URA?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while URA charges 0.69%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCHD or URA?
Over the past year SCHD returned +30.90% vs +20.61% for URA, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SCHD annualized +11.51% vs -2.48% for URA. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCHD or URA?
URA has been the more volatile fund at 37.2% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs URA -93.5%.
Should I hold both SCHD and URA?
SCHD and URA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and URA?
SCHD and URA share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 145 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or URA?
SCHD yields 3.13% while URA yields 5.30%, so URA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.