QQQ vs URAA
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | URAA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 1.30% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $37M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 15.25% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 12 | |
| YTD Return | +16.30% | -18.59% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.83% | +3.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.48% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.50% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 90.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -69.1% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 26, 2024 |
QQQ vs URAA Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X ETF (URAA) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year QQQ returned +24.83% while URAA returned +3.89%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.30% versus a loss of 18.59% for URAA.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
URAA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 90.9% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -69.1% for URAA. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while URAA charges 1.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $130 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 15.25% for URAA.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and URAA share 0 holdings out of 109 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or URAA?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while URAA charges 1.30%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $112 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or URAA?
Over the past year QQQ returned +24.83% vs +3.89% for URAA, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQ annualized +13.01% vs +13.04% for URAA. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or URAA?
URAA has been the more volatile fund at 90.9% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs URAA -69.1%.
Should I hold both QQQ and URAA?
QQQ and URAA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and URAA?
QQQ and URAA share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 109 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or URAA?
QQQ yields 0.44% while URAA yields 15.25%, so URAA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.