QQQ vs URE
QQQ vs URE
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs ProShares Ultra Real Estate
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | URE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $60M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 2.07% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 39 | |
| YTD Return | +18.20% | +21.99% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.63% | +15.67% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.54% | +10.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.12% | -4.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 42.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -97.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jan 30, 2007 |
QQQ vs URE Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.63% while URE returned +15.67%. Year to date, QQQ is up 18.20% versus a gain of 21.99% for URE.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.54% per year against +10.03% for URE; over five years the annualized figures are +15.12% and -4.38% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.11% annualized vs -4.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
URE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.0% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -97.3% for URE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while URE charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $95 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 2.07% for URE.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and URE share 0 holdings out of 135 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or URE?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while URE charges 0.95%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or URE?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.63% vs +15.67% for URE, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), QQQ annualized +13.11% vs -4.22% for URE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or URE?
URE has been the more volatile fund at 42.0% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs URE -97.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and URE?
QQQ and URE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and URE?
QQQ and URE share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 135 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or URE?
QQQ yields 0.41% while URE yields 2.07%, so URE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.