QQQ vs USE
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund
Which is better, QQQ or USE?
Each has led over a different period.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 3Y and the full window, USE over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | USE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $7M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 2.10% |
| Holdings | 107 | 9 |
| YTD Return | +21.18% | +57.28%Best |
| 1Y Return | +24.36% | +27.75%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.99%Best | +12.84% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.39% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1%Best | 33.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8%Best | -28.2% |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $23,951Best | $18,221 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | USCF Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | May 3, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 4, 2023 to Sep 23, 2026 (3.4 years).
QQQ vs USE growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs USE Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE) is an ETF from USCF Investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +24.36% while USE returned +27.75%. Year to date, QQQ is up 21.18% versus a gain of 57.28% for USE.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +27.99% per year against +12.84% for USE.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
USE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.4% compared with 17.1% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -28.2% for USE. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.16. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while USE charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $79 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 2.10% for USE.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and USE you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or USE?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while USE charges 0.79%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or USE?
Over the past year QQQ returned +24.36% vs +27.75% for USE, so USE leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or USE?
USE has been the more volatile fund at 33.4% annualized versus 17.1% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs USE -28.2%.
Should I hold both QQQ and USE?
QQQ and USE have a monthly-return correlation of -0.16, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or USE?
QQQ yields 0.44% while USE yields 2.10%, so USE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is USE better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 3Y and the full window, USE over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.