QQQ vs VPV
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VPV offers more diversification with 141 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | VPV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 1.71% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $3,177.19 | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 7.59% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 141 | |
| YTD Return | +16.23% | +10.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.23% | +20.60% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.75% | +12.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.78% | +1.63% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 13.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -57.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Tax Preferred | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Apr 30, 1993 |
QQQ vs VPV Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust (VPV) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% while VPV returned +20.60%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.23% versus a gain of 10.82% for VPV.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.75% per year against +12.19% for VPV; over five years the annualized figures are +14.78% and +1.63% respectively. Across the full 27-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +0.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 13.2% for VPV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -57.3% for VPV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.09. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while VPV charges 1.71%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $171 annually, a gap of $153 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 7.59% for VPV.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and VPV share 0 holdings out of 157 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or VPV?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VPV charges 1.71%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $153 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or VPV?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% vs +20.60% for VPV, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (27 years), QQQ annualized +13.02% vs +0.66% for VPV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or VPV?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 13.2% for VPV. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs VPV -57.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and VPV?
QQQ and VPV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.09, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and VPV?
QQQ and VPV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 157 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or VPV?
QQQ yields 0.44% while VPV yields 7.59%, so VPV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.