VPV vs VXUS
Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VPV | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.71% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $3,177.19 | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.59% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 141 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +13.11% | +15.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.47% | +26.73% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.99% | +20.35% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.15% | +9.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -57.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 30, 1993 | Jan 26, 2011 |
VPV vs VXUS Performance
Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust (VPV) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VPV returned +22.47% while VXUS returned +26.73%. Year to date, VPV is up 13.11% versus a gain of 15.52% for VXUS.
Over three years, VPV compounded at +12.99% per year against +20.35% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +2.15% and +9.40% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.90% annualized vs +0.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.2% for VPV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.3% for VPV and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VPV charges 1.71% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $171 vs $5 annually, a gap of $166 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VPV currently yields 7.59% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
VPV and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7924 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VPV or VXUS?
VPV has an expense ratio of 1.71% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $166 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VPV or VXUS?
Over the past year VPV returned +22.47% vs +26.73% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VPV annualized +0.73% vs +4.90% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VPV or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.2% for VPV. Worst drawdown: VPV -57.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both VPV and VXUS?
VPV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VPV and VXUS?
VPV and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7924 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VPV or VXUS?
VPV yields 7.59% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VPV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.