QQQ vs WBIY
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF
Which is better, QQQ or WBIY?
Large Cap Growth against Mid Cap Value.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | WBIY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.97% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $65M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 3.86% |
| Holdings | 107 | 51 |
| YTD Return | +21.71%Best | +13.58% |
| 1Y Return | +25.89%Best | +21.04% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.80%Best | +17.40% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.67%Best | +10.33% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.2%Best | 21.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1%Best | -52.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $20,706Best | $16,348 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5%Best | 48.0% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Mid Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Dec 19, 2016 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 22, 2016 to Sep 25, 2026 (9.8 years).
QQQ vs WBIY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.8 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs WBIY Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF (WBIY) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +25.89% while WBIY returned +21.04%. Year to date, QQQ is up 21.71% versus a gain of 13.58% for WBIY.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +28.80% per year against +17.40% for WBIY; over five years the annualized figures are +15.67% and +10.33% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +20.96% annualized vs +6.51%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WBIY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 19.2% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -52.1% for WBIY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while WBIY charges 0.97%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $97 annually, a gap of $79 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 3.86% for WBIY.
Holdings Overlap
0.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings WBIY also owns. 5.2% of WBIY's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
WBIY and QQQ share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 50 in WBIY, against full books of 107 and 51.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 102 and 50 positions we hold weights for.
QQQ holds 95 positions WBIY does not, 97.2% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.44%, AAPL 7.27%, MSFT 5.76%, AMZN 4.67%, MU 4.43%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in WBIY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 0.39% | 5.15% | 4.76% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and WBIY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or WBIY?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while WBIY charges 0.97%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $79 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or WBIY?
Over the past year QQQ returned +25.89% vs +21.04% for WBIY, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), QQQ annualized +20.96% vs +6.51% for WBIY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or WBIY?
WBIY has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 19.2% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs WBIY -52.1%.
Should I hold both QQQ and WBIY?
QQQ and WBIY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and WBIY?
5.2% of WBIY's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 5.2% of WBIY's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 50 in WBIY.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or WBIY?
QQQ yields 0.44% while WBIY yields 3.86%, so WBIY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIY better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.