IVV vs WBIY
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. WBIY delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WBIY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.97% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $64M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 4.06% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 51 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +22.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +31.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +19.41% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | +12.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 21.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -52.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | WBI Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 19, 2016 |
IVV vs WBIY Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and WBI Power Factor High Dividend ETF (WBIY) is a ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while WBIY returned +31.82%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 22.95% for WBIY.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +19.41% for WBIY; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and +12.38% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, WBIY has the edge at +7.46% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WBIY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -52.1% for WBIY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WBIY charges 0.97%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $97 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 4.06% for WBIY.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and WBIY share 17 holdings out of 538 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WBIY?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WBIY charges 0.97%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $94 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or WBIY?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +31.82% for WBIY, so WBIY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +7.46% for WBIY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or WBIY?
WBIY has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs WBIY -52.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and WBIY?
IVV and WBIY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WBIY?
IVV and WBIY share 17 common holdings with a 1.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 538 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WBIY?
IVV yields 1.10% while WBIY yields 4.06%, so WBIY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.