QQQ vs WFH
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Direxion Work From Home ETF
Which is better, QQQ or WFH?
Large Cap Growth against Mid Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | WFH |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.45% |
| AUM | $498.6B | $13M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 1.05% |
| Holdings | 321 | 41 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1%Best | 21.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1%Best | -51.2% |
| $10,000 over 5.3 years | $25,412Best | $15,044 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Direxion Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 25, 2020 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 344 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. QQQ has data through Oct 2, 2026 and WFH through Oct 23, 2025.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 25, 2020 to Oct 23, 2025 (5.3 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WFH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 20.1% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -51.2% for WFH. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while WFH charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $45 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 1.05% for WFH.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and WFH you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or WFH?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while WFH charges 0.45%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, QQQ or WFH?
WFH has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 20.1% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs WFH -51.2%.
Should I hold both QQQ and WFH?
QQQ and WFH have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or WFH?
QQQ yields 0.42% while WFH yields 1.05%, so WFH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WFH better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.