QQQ vs XBJL
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Innovator US Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | XBJL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.79% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $77M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 7 | |
| YTD Return | +16.19% | +6.62% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.22% | +10.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.47% | +12.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.34% | +9.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 8.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -11.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Innovator ETFs Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 30, 2021 |
QQQ vs XBJL Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year QQQ returned +25.22% while XBJL returned +10.45%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.19% versus a gain of 6.62% for XBJL.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.47% per year against +12.25% for XBJL; over five years the annualized figures are +14.34% and +9.23% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.01% annualized vs +9.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 8.0% for XBJL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -11.8% for XBJL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while XBJL charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $79 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for XBJL.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or XBJL?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while XBJL charges 0.79%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or XBJL?
Over the past year QQQ returned +25.22% vs +10.45% for XBJL, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QQQ annualized +13.01% vs +9.33% for XBJL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or XBJL?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 8.0% for XBJL. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs XBJL -11.8%.
Should I hold both QQQ and XBJL?
QQQ and XBJL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or XBJL?
QQQ yields 0.44% while XBJL yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.