QQQ vs XLE

QQQ vs XLE

Which is better, QQQ or XLE?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.

XLE has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 3Y and the full window, XLE over 1Y and 5Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 74.1%.

Lower Fees: XLEHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQXLE
Expense Ratio0.18%0.08%Best
AUM$498.6B$39.5B
Dividend Yield0.42%2.37%
Holdings32148
YTD Return+22.95%+45.39%Best
1Y Return+23.60%+52.54%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+27.53%Best+17.29%
5Y Return (annualized)+16.67%+22.48%Best
Volatility (annualized)30.5%25.0%Best
Max Drawdown-83.0%-76.7%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$21,617$27,563Best
Top 10 Weight47.2%Best74.1%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)SPDR State Street Global Advisors
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Value
InceptionMar 10, 1999Dec 16, 1998

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 10, 1999 to Oct 9, 2026 (27.6 years).

QQQ vs XLE growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 27.6 years both funds cover.

QQQ vs XLE Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year QQQ returned +23.60% while XLE returned +52.54%. Year to date, QQQ is up 22.95% versus a gain of 45.39% for XLE.

Over three years, QQQ compounded at +27.53% per year against +17.29% for XLE; over five years the annualized figures are +16.67% and +22.48% respectively. Across the full 28-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.18% annualized vs +7.09%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.5% compared with 25.0% for XLE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -76.7% for XLE. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while XLE charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $8 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 2.37% for XLE.

Holdings Overlap

QQQ already in XLE0.5%
XLE already in QQQ5.6%

0.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings XLE also owns. 5.6% of XLE's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.

XLE and QQQ share little of their money.

2 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 22 in XLE, against full books of 321 and 48.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 20 positions for XLE that do not appear in our book for QQQ (94.3% of the fund), and 94 for QQQ that do not appear in XLE (97.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQWeight in XLEDifference
BKRBaker Hughes Co0.26%3.33%3.07%
FANGDiamondback Energy, Inc.0.25%2.26%2.01%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of QQQ and XLE you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

QQQXLE

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or XLE?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while XLE charges 0.08%. XLE is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, QQQ or XLE?

Over the past year QQQ returned +23.60% vs +52.54% for XLE, so XLE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (28 years), QQQ annualized +13.18% vs +7.09% for XLE. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, QQQ or XLE?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.5% annualized versus 25.0% for XLE. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs XLE -76.7%.

Should I hold both QQQ and XLE?

QQQ and XLE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and XLE?

5.6% of XLE's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 5.6% of XLE's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 22 in XLE.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or XLE?

QQQ yields 0.42% while XLE yields 2.37%, so XLE currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XLE better than QQQ?

XLE has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 3Y and the full window, XLE over 1Y and 5Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 74.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.