QQQ vs XSVN
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
Quick Verdict
XSVN has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | XSVN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $392M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 4.13% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 39 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | -1.05% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +1.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +3.84% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 6.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -9.4% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | BondBloxx | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Sep 13, 2022 |
QQQ vs XSVN Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) is a ETF from BondBloxx. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while XSVN returned +1.45%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a loss of 1.05% for XSVN.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +3.84% for XSVN. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +2.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 6.6% for XSVN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -9.4% for XSVN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while XSVN charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $5 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 4.13% for XSVN.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and XSVN share 0 holdings out of 127 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or XSVN?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while XSVN charges 0.05%. XSVN is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $13 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or XSVN?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +1.45% for XSVN, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +2.16% for XSVN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or XSVN?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 6.6% for XSVN. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs XSVN -9.4%.
Should I hold both QQQ and XSVN?
QQQ and XSVN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and XSVN?
QQQ and XSVN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 127 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or XSVN?
QQQ yields 0.44% while XSVN yields 4.13%, so XSVN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.