VYM vs XSVN
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF vs BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VYM | XSVN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $81.6B | $392M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.24% | 4.13% | |
| Holdings | 616 | 39 | |
| YTD Return | +15.34% | -1.05% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.24% | +1.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.22% | +3.84% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.21% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 6.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -9.4% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | BondBloxx | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2006 | Sep 13, 2022 |
VYM vs XSVN Performance
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) is a ETF from BondBloxx. Over the past year VYM returned +23.24% while XSVN returned +1.45%. Year to date, VYM is up 15.34% versus a loss of 1.05% for XSVN.
Over three years, VYM compounded at +19.22% per year against +3.84% for XSVN. Across the full 4-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +2.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 6.6% for XSVN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for VYM and -9.4% for XSVN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VYM charges 0.04% per year while XSVN charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $5 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VYM currently yields 2.24% against 4.13% for XSVN.
Holdings Overlap
VYM and XSVN share 0 holdings out of 628 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VYM or XSVN?
VYM has an expense ratio of 0.04% while XSVN charges 0.05%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VYM or XSVN?
Over the past year VYM returned +23.24% vs +1.45% for XSVN, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), VYM annualized +7.04% vs +2.16% for XSVN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VYM or XSVN?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 6.6% for XSVN. Worst drawdown: VYM -58.8% vs XSVN -9.4%.
Should I hold both VYM and XSVN?
VYM and XSVN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VYM and XSVN?
VYM and XSVN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 628 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VYM or XSVN?
VYM yields 2.24% while XSVN yields 4.13%, so XSVN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.