QQQ vs ZSB
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. ZSB delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | ZSB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $2M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.90% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 15 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +5.17% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +53.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +5.26% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 21.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -49.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | USCF Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jan 10, 2023 |
QQQ vs ZSB Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy ETF (ZSB) is a ETF from USCF Investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while ZSB returned +53.19%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 5.17% for ZSB.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +5.26% for ZSB. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs -1.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 21.8% for ZSB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -49.3% for ZSB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.01. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while ZSB charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $59 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.90% for ZSB.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and ZSB share 0 holdings out of 103 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or ZSB?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while ZSB charges 0.59%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or ZSB?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +53.19% for ZSB, so ZSB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs -1.32% for ZSB. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or ZSB?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 21.8% for ZSB. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs ZSB -49.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and ZSB?
QQQ and ZSB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.01, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and ZSB?
QQQ and ZSB share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 103 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or ZSB?
QQQ yields 0.44% while ZSB yields 0.90%, so ZSB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.