VXUS vs ZSB
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF vs USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. ZSB delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VXUS | ZSB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $156.5B | $2M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.60% | 0.91% | |
| Holdings | 8,747 | 16 | |
| YTD Return | +14.07% | +3.70% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.24% | +49.66% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.27% | +3.89% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.14% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 21.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.9% | -49.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | USCF Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2011 | Jan 10, 2023 |
VXUS vs ZSB Performance
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy ETF (ZSB) is a ETF from USCF Investments. Over the past year VXUS returned +27.24% while ZSB returned +49.66%. Year to date, VXUS is up 14.07% versus a gain of 3.70% for ZSB.
Over three years, VXUS compounded at +19.27% per year against +3.89% for ZSB. Across the full 4-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.83% annualized vs -1.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ZSB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.9% for VXUS and -49.3% for ZSB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VXUS charges 0.05% per year while ZSB charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $59 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VXUS currently yields 2.60% against 0.91% for ZSB.
Holdings Overlap
VXUS and ZSB share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VXUS or ZSB?
VXUS has an expense ratio of 0.05% while ZSB charges 0.59%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VXUS or ZSB?
Over the past year VXUS returned +27.24% vs +49.66% for ZSB, so ZSB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), VXUS annualized +4.83% vs -1.71% for ZSB. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VXUS or ZSB?
ZSB has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: VXUS -39.9% vs ZSB -49.3%.
Should I hold both VXUS and ZSB?
VXUS and ZSB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VXUS and ZSB?
VXUS and ZSB share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VXUS or ZSB?
VXUS yields 2.60% while ZSB yields 0.91%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.