QSIG vs SCHD
WisdomTree US Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QSIG | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $53M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.47% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 625 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | -1.63% | +25.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.12% | +32.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.36% | +15.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.68% | +9.70% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.8% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.5% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 27, 2016 | Oct 20, 2011 |
QSIG vs SCHD Performance
WisdomTree US Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (QSIG) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year QSIG returned +0.12% while SCHD returned +32.31%. Year to date, QSIG is down 1.63% versus a gain of 25.33% for SCHD.
Over three years, QSIG compounded at +4.36% per year against +15.40% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +1.68% and +9.70% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.45% annualized vs +2.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 2.8% for QSIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.5% for QSIG and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QSIG charges 0.18% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $6 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QSIG currently yields 4.47% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
QSIG and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 109 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QSIG or SCHD?
QSIG has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QSIG or SCHD?
Over the past year QSIG returned +0.12% vs +32.31% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), QSIG annualized +2.13% vs +11.45% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QSIG or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 2.8% for QSIG. Worst drawdown: QSIG -23.5% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both QSIG and SCHD?
QSIG and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QSIG and SCHD?
QSIG and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 109 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QSIG or SCHD?
QSIG yields 4.47% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so QSIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.