QSIG vs VYM
WisdomTree US Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QSIG | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $53M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.47% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 625 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -1.49% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.25% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.25% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.70% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.5% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 27, 2016 | Nov 10, 2006 |
QSIG vs VYM Performance
WisdomTree US Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (QSIG) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QSIG returned +0.25% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, QSIG is down 1.49% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, QSIG compounded at +4.25% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +1.70% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +2.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 2.8% for QSIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.5% for QSIG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QSIG charges 0.18% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $4 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QSIG currently yields 4.47% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
QSIG and VYM share 0 holdings out of 567 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QSIG or VYM?
QSIG has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $14 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QSIG or VYM?
Over the past year QSIG returned +0.25% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), QSIG annualized +2.14% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QSIG or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 2.8% for QSIG. Worst drawdown: QSIG -23.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both QSIG and VYM?
QSIG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QSIG and VYM?
QSIG and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 567 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QSIG or VYM?
QSIG yields 4.47% while VYM yields 2.86%, so QSIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.