RAYC vs VTI
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RAYC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $82M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.19% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 76 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +31.98% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.93% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.77% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -5.51% | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -57.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 30, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
RAYC vs VTI Performance
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF (RAYC) is a ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RAYC returned +22.93% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, RAYC is up 31.98% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, RAYC compounded at +2.77% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -5.51% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs -5.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RAYC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.6% for RAYC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.20. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RAYC charges 0.80% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RAYC currently yields 5.19% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RAYC and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2855 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RAYC or VTI?
RAYC has an expense ratio of 0.80% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RAYC or VTI?
Over the past year RAYC returned +22.93% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), RAYC annualized -5.51% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RAYC or VTI?
RAYC has been the more volatile fund at 22.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RAYC -57.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RAYC and VTI?
RAYC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.20, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RAYC and VTI?
RAYC and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2855 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RAYC or VTI?
RAYC yields 5.19% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RAYC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.