RBLU vs SCHD
RBLU vs SCHD
T-REX 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RBLU | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $9M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.23% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 3 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | -87.76% | +24.26% | |
| 1Y Return | -96.12% | +31.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 134.9% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -97.0% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 4, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
RBLU vs SCHD Performance
T-REX 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) is a ETF from REX Shares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year RBLU returned -96.12% while SCHD returned +31.38%. Year to date, RBLU is down 87.76% versus a gain of 24.26% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RBLU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 134.9% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -97.0% for RBLU and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.33. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RBLU charges 1.05% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $6 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RBLU currently yields 4.23% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
RBLU and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 101 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RBLU or SCHD?
RBLU has an expense ratio of 1.05% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $99 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RBLU or SCHD?
Over the past year RBLU returned -96.12% vs +31.38% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), RBLU annualized -74.78% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RBLU or SCHD?
RBLU has been the more volatile fund at 134.9% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: RBLU -97.0% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both RBLU and SCHD?
RBLU and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.33, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RBLU and SCHD?
RBLU and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 101 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RBLU or SCHD?
RBLU yields 4.23% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so RBLU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.