RBLU vs VTI
T-REX 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RBLU | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $9M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.23% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 3 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -88.28% | +14.16% | |
| 1Y Return | -96.34% | +23.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 134.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -97.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 4, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
RBLU vs VTI Performance
T-REX 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) is a ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RBLU returned -96.34% while VTI returned +23.62%. Year to date, RBLU is down 88.28% versus a gain of 14.16% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RBLU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 134.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -97.0% for RBLU and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RBLU charges 1.05% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $3 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RBLU currently yields 4.23% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RBLU and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RBLU or VTI?
RBLU has an expense ratio of 1.05% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $102 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RBLU or VTI?
Over the past year RBLU returned -96.34% vs +23.62% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), RBLU annualized -75.33% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RBLU or VTI?
RBLU has been the more volatile fund at 134.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RBLU -97.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RBLU and VTI?
RBLU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RBLU and VTI?
RBLU and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RBLU or VTI?
RBLU yields 4.23% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RBLU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.