RDTY vs SFEB
YieldMax Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs FT Vest US Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - February
Which is better, RDTY or SFEB?
RDTY has been ahead.
SFEB has a lower expense ratio. RDTY led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RDTY | SFEB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.73% | 0.90%Best |
| AUM | $17M | $128M |
| Dividend Yield | 43.58% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 8 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +15.02%Best | +8.90% |
| 1Y Return | +14.05%Best | +12.37% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 7.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.2% | -10.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $14,338Best | $12,536 |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Mar 5, 2025 | Feb 20, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 6, 2025 to Oct 12, 2026 (1.6 years).
RDTY vs SFEB growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
RDTY vs SFEB Performance
YieldMax Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF and FT Vest US Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - February (SFEB) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year RDTY returned +14.05% while SFEB returned +12.37%. Year to date, RDTY is up 15.02% versus a gain of 8.90% for SFEB.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RDTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 7.5% for SFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.2% for RDTY and -10.1% for SFEB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RDTY charges 1.73% per year while SFEB charges 0.90%. On a $10,000 position that is $173 vs $90 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RDTY currently yields 43.58% against 0.00% for SFEB.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RDTY and SFEB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RDTY or SFEB?
RDTY has an expense ratio of 1.73% while SFEB charges 0.90%. SFEB is the cheaper option, by $83 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RDTY or SFEB?
Over the past year RDTY returned +14.05% vs +12.37% for SFEB, so RDTY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RDTY annualized +25.26% vs +15.17% for SFEB. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RDTY or SFEB?
RDTY has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 7.5% for SFEB. Worst drawdown: RDTY -16.2% vs SFEB -10.1%.
Should I hold both RDTY and SFEB?
RDTY and SFEB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, RDTY or SFEB?
RDTY yields 43.58% while SFEB yields 0.00%, so RDTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SFEB better than RDTY?
SFEB has a lower expense ratio. RDTY led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.