REW vs VTI
ProShares UltraShort Technology vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | REW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.74% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -46.01% | +13.48% | |
| 1Y Return | -54.39% | +19.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -45.43% | +20.94% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -35.91% | +11.75% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 38.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
REW vs VTI Performance
ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year REW returned -54.39% while VTI returned +19.90%. Year to date, REW is down 46.01% versus a gain of 13.48% for VTI.
Over three years, REW compounded at -45.43% per year against +20.94% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -35.91% and +11.75% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.10% annualized vs -37.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
REW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 38.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for REW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.83. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
REW charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, REW currently yields 6.74% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, REW or VTI?
REW has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, REW or VTI?
Over the past year REW returned -54.39% vs +19.90% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), REW annualized -37.72% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, REW or VTI?
REW has been the more volatile fund at 38.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: REW -100.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both REW and VTI?
REW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, REW or VTI?
REW yields 6.74% while VTI yields 1.07%, so REW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.