REXC vs VTI
Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, REXC or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 75.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | REXC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $75M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 42 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -22.41% | +12.28%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.78% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.89% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.94% |
| Top 10 Weight | 75.3% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 14, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
REXC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
REXC vs VTI Performance
Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF (REXC) is an ETF from Sprott ETFS and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, REXC is down 22.41% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
REXC charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, REXC currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
32.0% of REXC's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
6 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in REXC and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 42 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,149 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for REXC (97.4% of the fund), and 4 for REXC that do not appear in VTI (3.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
32.0% of REXC is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, REXC or VTI?
REXC has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between REXC and VTI?
32.0% of REXC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.0% of VTI's is in holdings REXC also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in REXC and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, REXC or VTI?
REXC yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than REXC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 75.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.