REXC vs VOO
Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, REXC or VOO?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 75.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | REXC | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $75M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 42 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -22.41% | +12.25%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.03% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.25% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.08% |
| Top 10 Weight | 75.3% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 14, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
REXC vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
REXC vs VOO Performance
Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF (REXC) is an ETF from Sprott ETFS and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, REXC is down 22.41% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
REXC charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, REXC currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 42 holdings in REXC and 494 in VOO, totalling 100.0% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in REXC and 494 in VOO, against full books of 42 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 487 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for REXC (99.2% of the fund), and 9 for REXC that do not appear in VOO (33.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of REXC and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, REXC or VOO?
REXC has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, REXC or VOO?
REXC yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than REXC?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 75.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.