RGTU vs VYM
Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RGTU | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.30% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $12M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | -71.67% | +15.34% | |
| 1Y Return | -55.04% | +23.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.22% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 258.4% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -97.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Tradr ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 23, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
RGTU vs VYM Performance
Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) is a ETF from Tradr ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RGTU returned -55.04% while VYM returned +23.24%. Year to date, RGTU is down 71.67% versus a gain of 15.34% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RGTU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 258.4% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -97.9% for RGTU and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RGTU charges 1.30% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $4 annually, a gap of $126 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RGTU currently yields 0.00% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
RGTU and VYM share 0 holdings out of 604 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RGTU or VYM?
RGTU has an expense ratio of 1.30% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $126 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RGTU or VYM?
Over the past year RGTU returned -55.04% vs +23.24% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), RGTU annualized -37.87% vs +7.04% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RGTU or VYM?
RGTU has been the more volatile fund at 258.4% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: RGTU -97.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both RGTU and VYM?
RGTU and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RGTU and VYM?
RGTU and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 604 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RGTU or VYM?
RGTU yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.