RIGS vs VOO
ALPS Strategic Income Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RIGS | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $61M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.82% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 80 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +1.40% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.14% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.84% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.12% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 7, 2013 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RIGS vs VOO Performance
ALPS Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RIGS returned +6.14% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, RIGS is up 1.40% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, RIGS compounded at +4.84% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +2.12% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +1.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 4.7% for RIGS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.2% for RIGS and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RIGS charges 0.46% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $3 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RIGS currently yields 4.82% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RIGS and VOO share 0 holdings out of 574 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RIGS or VOO?
RIGS has an expense ratio of 0.46% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RIGS or VOO?
Over the past year RIGS returned +6.14% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), RIGS annualized +1.02% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RIGS or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 4.7% for RIGS. Worst drawdown: RIGS -18.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RIGS and VOO?
RIGS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RIGS and VOO?
RIGS and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 574 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RIGS or VOO?
RIGS yields 4.82% while VOO yields 1.09%, so RIGS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.