RNEM vs VXUS

Quick Verdict

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.

Lower Fees: VXUSHigher Returns: VXUSMore Diversified: VXUS

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRNEMVXUSWinner
Expense Ratio0.76%0.05%
AUM$17M$156.5B
Dividend Yield2.77%2.60%
Holdings2908,747
YTD Return+2.06%+14.19%
1Y Return+7.02%+27.38%
3Y Return (annualized)+7.67%+19.53%
5Y Return (annualized)+5.45%+9.03%
Volatility (annualized)14.3%15.1%
Max Drawdown-42.3%-39.9%
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 20, 2017Jan 26, 2011

RNEM vs VXUS Performance

First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RNEM returned +7.02% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, RNEM is up 2.06% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.

Over three years, RNEM compounded at +7.67% per year against +19.53% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +5.45% and +9.03% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.83% annualized vs +3.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.3% for RNEM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.3% for RNEM and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RNEM charges 0.76% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $5 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RNEM currently yields 2.77% against 2.60% for VXUS.

Holdings Overlap

5.2%overlap

RNEM and VXUS share 193 holdings out of 7940 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RNEMWeight in VXUSDifference
2303:TW3.54%0.05%3.49%
0700:KY2.20%0.92%1.28%
3320:HK2.76%0.00%2.76%
3034:TWProProPro
TCS:MBProProPro
500114:MBProProPro
500112:MBProProPro
AXISBANK:MBProProPro
ICICIBANK:MBProProPro
PIDI:MBProProPro
FundXLS Pro
See all 10 holdings RNEM shares with VXUS
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$45/quarter Pro · Cancel anytime

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RNEM or VXUS?

RNEM has an expense ratio of 0.76% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.

Which performed better, RNEM or VXUS?

Over the past year RNEM returned +7.02% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), RNEM annualized +3.04% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, RNEM or VXUS?

VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.3% for RNEM. Worst drawdown: RNEM -42.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.

Should I hold both RNEM and VXUS?

RNEM and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between RNEM and VXUS?

RNEM and VXUS share 193 common holdings with a 5.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7940 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, RNEM or VXUS?

RNEM yields 2.77% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so RNEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.