RODE vs VTI
Hartford Multifactor Diversified International ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RODE | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $17M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.06% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 317 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +0.73% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.70% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.26% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.23% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 10, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
RODE vs VTI Performance
Hartford Multifactor Diversified International ETF (RODE) is a ETF from Hartford Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RODE returned -0.70% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, RODE is up 0.73% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, RODE compounded at +7.26% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.23% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs +4.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RODE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.7% for RODE and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RODE charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RODE currently yields 6.06% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RODE or VTI?
RODE has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RODE or VTI?
Over the past year RODE returned -0.70% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), RODE annualized +4.60% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RODE or VTI?
RODE has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RODE -36.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RODE and VTI?
RODE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, RODE or VTI?
RODE yields 6.06% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RODE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.