RSF vs VOO
RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund, Inc. vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, RSF or VOO?
High Yield Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSF | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 5.25% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $52M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 9.12% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 9,552 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +7.64% | +14.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.49% | +17.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.00% | +23.16%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.31% | +13.85%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.6%Best | 15.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -44.2% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,349 | $19,128Best |
| Fund Family | RiverNorth | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | High Yield Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 22, 2016 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 1, 2016 to Sep 21, 2026 (9.8 years).
RSF vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.8 years both funds cover.
RSF vs VOO Performance
RiverNorth Capital and Income Fund, Inc. (RSF) is an ETF from RiverNorth and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSF returned +8.49% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, RSF is up 7.64% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.
Over three years, RSF compounded at +8.00% per year against +23.16% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +4.31% and +13.85% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +14.65% annualized vs +0.05%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 8.6% for RSF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.2% for RSF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSF charges 5.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $525 vs $3 annually, a gap of $522 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSF currently yields 9.12% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 25 holdings in RSF and 494 in VOO, totalling 6.5% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 122 days apart, RSF as of Mar 31, 2026 and VOO as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in RSF and 494 in VOO, against full books of 9,552 and 509.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RSF and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSF or VOO?
RSF has an expense ratio of 5.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $522 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RSF or VOO?
Over the past year RSF returned +8.49% vs +17.31% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), RSF annualized +0.05% vs +14.65% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RSF or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 8.6% for RSF. Worst drawdown: RSF -44.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RSF and VOO?
RSF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSF or VOO?
RSF yields 9.12% while VOO yields 1.04%, so RSF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than RSF?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.