RWO vs VXUS
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, RWO or VXUS?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RWO | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $1.3B | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.14% | 2.59% |
| Holdings | 244 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +10.80% | +16.15%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.10% | +27.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.27% | +20.48%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.32% | +9.09%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 15.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -43.8% | -39.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,678 | $15,450Best |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 7, 2008 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 28, 2011 to Sep 4, 2026 (15.6 years).
RWO vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.6 years both funds cover.
RWO vs VXUS Performance
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RWO returned +13.10% while VXUS returned +27.58%. Year to date, RWO is up 10.80% versus a gain of 16.15% for VXUS.
Over three years, RWO compounded at +10.27% per year against +20.48% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +1.32% and +9.09% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.93% annualized vs +3.01%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RWO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 15.0% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.8% for RWO and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RWO charges 0.50% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $5 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RWO currently yields 3.14% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 21.3% of RWO's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
RWO and VXUS share little of their money.
94 positions in common, counted across the 223 positions we hold weights for in RWO and 8,094 in VXUS, against full books of 244 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RWO | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8801:JPMitsui Fudosan Co. Ltd. Com Stk | 1.53% | 0.05% | 1.48% |
| SGRO:LNSegro Plc | 1.01% | 0.04% | 0.97% |
| SCG:AUScentre | 0.85% | 0.03% | 0.82% |
| SPSN:SMSwiss Prime Site Ag | 0.74% | 0.03% | 0.71% |
| C38U:SICapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust Capitaland Integrated Comm Tr | 0.67% | 0.03% | 0.64% |
| EGPEastgroup Properties Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.63% |
| A17U:SICapitaland Ascendas Reit | 0.47% | 0.02% | 0.45% |
| PSPN:SMPsp Swiss Property Ag | 0.47% | 0.02% | 0.45% |
| VCX:AUVicinity Centres | 0.44% | 0.02% | 0.42% |
| AED:BRAedifica Nv | 0.42% | 0.02% | 0.40% |
21.3% of RWO is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RWO or VXUS?
RWO has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RWO or VXUS?
Over the past year RWO returned +13.10% vs +27.58% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), RWO annualized +3.01% vs +4.93% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RWO or VXUS?
RWO has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 15.0% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: RWO -43.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both RWO and VXUS?
RWO and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RWO and VXUS?
At least 21.3% of RWO's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 94 positions in common, counted across the 223 positions we hold weights for in RWO and 8,094 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, RWO or VXUS?
RWO yields 3.14% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so RWO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than RWO?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.