RYLD vs VTI
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RYLD delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RYLD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.4B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.57% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 12 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.63% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.48% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.96% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.13% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 17, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
RYLD vs VTI Performance
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RYLD returned +24.48% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, RYLD is up 13.63% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, RYLD compounded at +8.96% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.13% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs +3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.8% for RYLD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.5% for RYLD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RYLD charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RYLD currently yields 11.57% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RYLD and VTI share 4 holdings out of 2785 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RYLD or VTI?
RYLD has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RYLD or VTI?
Over the past year RYLD returned +24.48% vs +23.31% for VTI, so RYLD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), RYLD annualized +3.20% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RYLD or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.8% for RYLD. Worst drawdown: RYLD -42.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RYLD and VTI?
RYLD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RYLD and VTI?
RYLD and VTI share 4 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2785 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RYLD or VTI?
RYLD yields 11.57% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RYLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.