RYLD vs VOO
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RYLD delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RYLD | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.4B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.57% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 12 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.25% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.88% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.14% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 17, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RYLD vs VOO Performance
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RYLD returned +24.25% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, RYLD is up 13.43% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Over three years, RYLD compounded at +8.88% per year against +21.78% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +3.14% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +3.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RYLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.5% for RYLD and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RYLD charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RYLD currently yields 11.57% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RYLD and VOO share 0 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RYLD or VOO?
RYLD has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RYLD or VOO?
Over the past year RYLD returned +24.25% vs +23.01% for VOO, so RYLD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), RYLD annualized +3.17% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RYLD or VOO?
RYLD has been the more volatile fund at 14.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RYLD -42.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RYLD and VOO?
RYLD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RYLD and VOO?
RYLD and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RYLD or VOO?
RYLD yields 11.57% while VOO yields 1.09%, so RYLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.