SCHD vs SKF
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs ProShares UltraShort Financials
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | SKF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $112.2B | $11M | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.13% | 4.64% | |
| Holdings | 103 | 10 | |
| YTD Return | +27.60% | -7.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.63% | -11.51% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.43% | -28.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.05% | -18.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 38.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -100.0% | |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Jan 30, 2007 |
SCHD vs SKF Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year SCHD returned +29.63% while SKF returned -11.51%. Year to date, SCHD is up 27.60% versus a loss of 7.28% for SKF.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +16.43% per year against -28.49% for SKF; over five years the annualized figures are +10.05% and -18.30% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.54% annualized vs -28.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SKF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 38.8% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -100.0% for SKF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.81. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while SKF charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $95 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.13% against 4.64% for SKF.
Holdings Overlap
SCHD and SKF share 0 holdings out of 101 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or SKF?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while SKF charges 0.95%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $89 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCHD or SKF?
Over the past year SCHD returned +29.63% vs -11.51% for SKF, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SCHD annualized +11.54% vs -28.21% for SKF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCHD or SKF?
SKF has been the more volatile fund at 38.8% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs SKF -100.0%.
Should I hold both SCHD and SKF?
SCHD and SKF have a monthly-return correlation of -0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and SKF?
SCHD and SKF share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 101 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or SKF?
SCHD yields 3.13% while SKF yields 4.64%, so SKF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.