SKF vs VOO
ProShares UltraShort Financials vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SKF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $10M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.13% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -10.93% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | -17.14% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -28.58% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -18.99% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 38.9% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SKF vs VOO Performance
ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SKF returned -17.14% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, SKF is down 10.93% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, SKF compounded at -28.58% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -18.99% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs -28.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SKF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 38.9% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for SKF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.86. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SKF charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SKF currently yields 4.13% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SKF and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SKF or VOO?
SKF has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SKF or VOO?
Over the past year SKF returned -17.14% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), SKF annualized -28.42% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SKF or VOO?
SKF has been the more volatile fund at 38.9% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SKF -100.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SKF and VOO?
SKF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SKF and VOO?
SKF and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SKF or VOO?
SKF yields 4.13% while VOO yields 1.09%, so SKF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.