SCHD vs STBQ
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF
Which is better, SCHD or STBQ?
Large Cap Value against Multi Alternative.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | STBQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.69% |
| AUM | $119.9B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.96% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 204 | 59 |
| YTD Return | +33.09%Best | -21.56% |
| 1Y Return | +37.17%Best | -21.45% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.32% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.36% | - |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Amplify ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Dec 23, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
SCHD vs STBQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SCHD vs STBQ Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF (STBQ) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs. Over the past year SCHD returned +37.17% while STBQ returned -21.45%. Year to date, SCHD is up 33.09% versus a loss of 21.56% for STBQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while STBQ charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $69 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 2.96% against 0.00% for STBQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 98 holdings in SCHD and 26 in STBQ, totalling 99.8% and 74.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 26 in STBQ, against full books of 204 and 59.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCHD and STBQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or STBQ?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while STBQ charges 0.69%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $63 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCHD or STBQ?
Over the past year SCHD returned +37.17% vs -21.45% for STBQ, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or STBQ?
SCHD yields 2.96% while STBQ yields 0.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is STBQ better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.