SCHD vs TMAR
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | TMAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $103.7B | $14M | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.31% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +24.26% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.38% | +21.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.72% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 7.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -9.9% | |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Mar 21, 2025 |
SCHD vs TMAR Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year SCHD returned +31.38% while TMAR returned +21.22%. Year to date, SCHD is up 24.26% versus a gain of 13.14% for TMAR.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 7.4% for TMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -9.9% for TMAR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.11. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while TMAR charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $95 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.31% against 0.00% for TMAR.
Holdings Overlap
SCHD and TMAR share 0 holdings out of 101 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or TMAR?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while TMAR charges 0.95%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $89 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCHD or TMAR?
Over the past year SCHD returned +31.38% vs +21.22% for TMAR, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), SCHD annualized +11.39% vs +21.28% for TMAR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCHD or TMAR?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 7.4% for TMAR. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs TMAR -9.9%.
Should I hold both SCHD and TMAR?
SCHD and TMAR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.11, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and TMAR?
SCHD and TMAR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 101 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or TMAR?
SCHD yields 3.31% while TMAR yields 0.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.