TMAR vs VOO
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TMAR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $14M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +13.46% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.92% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 21, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
TMAR vs VOO Performance
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TMAR returned +21.92% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, TMAR is up 13.46% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 7.4% for TMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.9% for TMAR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TMAR charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TMAR currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
TMAR and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TMAR or VOO?
TMAR has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TMAR or VOO?
Over the past year TMAR returned +21.92% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), TMAR annualized +21.34% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TMAR or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 7.4% for TMAR. Worst drawdown: TMAR -9.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both TMAR and VOO?
TMAR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TMAR and VOO?
TMAR and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TMAR or VOO?
TMAR yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.