SCHD vs UPAL
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | UPAL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $112.2B | $3M | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.13% | 0.26% | |
| Holdings | 103 | 4 | |
| YTD Return | +28.33% | -35.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.37% | - | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.64% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.04% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | - | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -48.2% | |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Apr 20, 2026 |
SCHD vs UPAL Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF (UPAL) is a ETF from ProShares. Year to date, SCHD is up 28.33% versus a loss of 35.25% for UPAL.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -48.2% for UPAL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while UPAL charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $95 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.13% against 0.26% for UPAL.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or UPAL?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while UPAL charges 0.95%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $89 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or UPAL?
SCHD yields 3.13% while UPAL yields 0.26%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.