UPAL vs VTI

UPAL vs VTI

Which is better, UPAL or VTI?

VTI costs less.

VTI has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUPALVTI
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%Best
AUM$3M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.23%1.03%
Holdings43,543
YTD Return-41.22%+12.30%Best
1Y Return-+16.08%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.01%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.36%
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
Style-Large Cap Blend
InceptionApr 20, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

UPAL vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

UPAL vs VTI Performance

ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF (UPAL) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, UPAL is down 41.22% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

UPAL charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UPAL currently yields 0.23% against 1.03% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of UPAL and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

UPALVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, UPAL or VTI?

UPAL has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which pays a higher dividend, UPAL or VTI?

UPAL yields 0.23% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than UPAL?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.