SCHD vs XLSR
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs State Street US Sector Rotation ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | XLSR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.70% | |
| AUM | $108.7B | $1.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.13% | 0.46% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 21 | |
| YTD Return | +28.63% | +6.73% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.53% | +17.40% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.97% | +16.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.47% | +9.50% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7% | 16.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -32.9% | |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Apr 2, 2019 |
SCHD vs XLSR Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and State Street US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year SCHD returned +32.53% while XLSR returned +17.40%. Year to date, SCHD is up 28.63% versus a gain of 6.73% for XLSR.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +16.97% per year against +16.79% for XLSR; over five years the annualized figures are +10.47% and +9.50% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, XLSR has the edge at +12.44% annualized vs +11.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XLSR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 13.7% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -32.9% for XLSR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while XLSR charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $70 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.13% against 0.46% for XLSR.
Holdings Overlap
SCHD and XLSR share 3 holdings out of 131 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or XLSR?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while XLSR charges 0.70%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $64 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCHD or XLSR?
Over the past year SCHD returned +32.53% vs +17.40% for XLSR, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), SCHD annualized +11.63% vs +12.44% for XLSR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCHD or XLSR?
XLSR has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 13.7% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs XLSR -32.9%.
Should I hold both SCHD and XLSR?
SCHD and XLSR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and XLSR?
SCHD and XLSR share 3 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 131 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or XLSR?
SCHD yields 3.13% while XLSR yields 0.46%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.