VOO vs XLSR

VOO vs XLSR

Which is better, VOO or XLSR?

Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 86.4%.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVOOXLSR
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.70%
AUM$997.4B$1.0B
Dividend Yield1.04%0.46%
Holdings50935
YTD Return+11.55%Best+4.98%
1Y Return+17.54%Best+12.16%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.71%Best+15.30%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.80%Best+8.86%
Volatility (annualized)16.6%16.2%Best
Max Drawdown-34.3%-32.9%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$18,262Best$15,288
Top 10 Weight36.4%Best86.4%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)State Street Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 7, 2010Apr 2, 2019

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 3, 2019 to Sep 10, 2026 (7.4 years).

VOO vs XLSR growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.4 years both funds cover.

VOO vs XLSR Performance

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year VOO returned +17.54% while XLSR returned +12.16%. Year to date, VOO is up 11.55% versus a gain of 4.98% for XLSR.

Over three years, VOO compounded at +20.71% per year against +15.30% for XLSR; over five years the annualized figures are +12.80% and +8.86% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +15.18% annualized vs +12.09%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 16.2% for XLSR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -32.9% for XLSR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VOO charges 0.03% per year while XLSR charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $70 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.04% against 0.46% for XLSR.

Holdings Overlap

VOO already in XLSR39.9%
XLSR already in VOO25.3%

39.9% of VOO's money is in holdings XLSR also owns. 25.3% of XLSR's money is in holdings VOO also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, VOO as of Jun 30, 2026 and XLSR as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

16 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 25 in XLSR, against full books of 509 and 35.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 9 positions for XLSR that do not appear in our book for VOO (74.7% of the fund), and 480 for VOO that do not appear in XLSR (59.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VOOWeight in XLSRDifference
NVDANvidia Corp.7.51%4.55%2.96%
AAPLApple, Inc6.59%3.95%2.64%
GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.0013.25%4.36%1.11%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 374.30%3.05%1.25%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.59%3.39%0.80%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.62%0.93%2.69%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.77%1.45%1.32%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.1.92%2.21%0.29%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.02%0.60%1.42%
TSLATesla Inc1.84%0.00%1.84%

39.9% of VOO is already inside XLSR.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

VOOXLSR

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VOO or XLSR?

VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XLSR charges 0.70%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, VOO or XLSR?

Over the past year VOO returned +17.54% vs +12.16% for XLSR, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), VOO annualized +15.18% vs +12.09% for XLSR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, VOO or XLSR?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 16.2% for XLSR. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs XLSR -32.9%.

Should I hold both VOO and XLSR?

VOO and XLSR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between VOO and XLSR?

39.9% of VOO's money is in holdings XLSR also owns. 25.3% of XLSR's is in holdings VOO also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 25 in XLSR.

Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or XLSR?

VOO yields 1.04% while XLSR yields 0.46%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XLSR better than VOO?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 86.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.