SDEM vs VTI
Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SDEM or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SDEM led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SDEM is less concentrated, with 23.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SDEM | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $44M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.88% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 66 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +11.90% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +23.97%Best | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.51% | +23.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.20% | +12.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -57.2% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,509 | $18,286Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.8%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 16, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 17, 2015 to Oct 2, 2026 (11.5 years).
SDEM vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.5 years both funds cover.
SDEM vs VTI Performance
Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SDEM returned +23.97% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, SDEM is up 11.90% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, SDEM compounded at +20.51% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.20% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.23% annualized vs +0.70%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SDEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.2% for SDEM and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SDEM charges 0.66% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $3 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SDEM currently yields 4.88% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
1.6% of SDEM's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
SDEM and VTI share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, SDEM as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in SDEM and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 66 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SDEM (97.5% of the fund), and 2 for SDEM that do not appear in VTI (3.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SDEM | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| EAST:EGEastern Co Sae | 1.64% | 0.00% | 1.64% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SDEM and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SDEM or VTI?
SDEM has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $63 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SDEM or VTI?
Over the past year SDEM returned +23.97% vs +15.92% for VTI, so SDEM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), SDEM annualized +0.70% vs +12.23% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SDEM or VTI?
SDEM has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SDEM -57.2% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both SDEM and VTI?
SDEM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SDEM and VTI?
1.6% of SDEM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.0% of VTI's is in holdings SDEM also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in SDEM and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SDEM or VTI?
SDEM yields 4.88% while VTI yields 1.03%, so SDEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SDEM?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SDEM led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SDEM is less concentrated, with 23.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.