SIXF vs VTI
AllianzIM US Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SIXF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $47M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +9.77% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.77% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
SIXF vs VTI Performance
AllianzIM US Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETF (SIXF) is a ETF from AllianzIM and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SIXF returned +15.77% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, SIXF is up 9.77% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 5.9% for SIXF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.3% for SIXF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SIXF charges 0.74% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $3 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SIXF currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SIXF or VTI?
SIXF has an expense ratio of 0.74% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SIXF or VTI?
Over the past year SIXF returned +15.77% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), SIXF annualized +14.03% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SIXF or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 5.9% for SIXF. Worst drawdown: SIXF -11.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SIXF and VTI?
SIXF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
Which pays a higher dividend, SIXF or VTI?
SIXF yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.