SLWS vs VTI
SLW Short Duration Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SLWS or VTI?
Short Term Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLWS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $388M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.08% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 202 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +2.49% | +14.05%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.56% | +16.93%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.65% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.46% |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Short Term Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 19, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
SLWS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SLWS vs VTI Performance
SLW Short Duration Income ETF (SLWS) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLWS returned +3.56% while VTI returned +16.93%. Year to date, SLWS is up 2.49% versus a gain of 14.05% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLWS charges 0.42% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $3 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLWS currently yields 4.08% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 96 holdings in SLWS and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 51.6% and 98.1% of the two funds. That is not enough of SLWS to divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
1 positions in common, counted across the 96 positions we hold weights for in SLWS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 202 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SLWS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SONSonoco Products Company | 0.31% | 0.01% | 0.30% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SLWS and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLWS or VTI?
SLWS has an expense ratio of 0.42% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $39 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SLWS or VTI?
Over the past year SLWS returned +3.56% vs +16.93% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLWS or VTI?
SLWS yields 4.08% while VTI yields 1.03%, so SLWS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SLWS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.