SLYG vs VOO
State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SLYG or VOO?
Small Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SLYG led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SLYG is less concentrated, with 9.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLYG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4.9B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.67% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 351 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +15.03%Best | +11.48% |
| 1Y Return | +17.09%Best | +15.94% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.28% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.28% | +12.66%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -43.0% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,934 | $18,149Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 9.8%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 25, 2000 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 15, 2026 (16 years).
SLYG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
SLYG vs VOO Performance
State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLYG returned +17.09% while VOO returned +15.94%. Year to date, SLYG is up 15.03% versus a gain of 11.48% for VOO.
Over three years, SLYG compounded at +14.28% per year against +21.01% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +5.28% and +12.66% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.34% annualized vs +10.94%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SLYG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.0% for SLYG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLYG charges 0.15% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLYG currently yields 0.67% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 347 holdings in SLYG and 494 in VOO, totalling 99.1% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 347 positions we hold weights for in SLYG and 494 in VOO, against full books of 351 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 487 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SLYG (99.2% of the fund), and 340 for SLYG that do not appear in VOO (96.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SLYG and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLYG or VOO?
SLYG has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SLYG or VOO?
Over the past year SLYG returned +17.09% vs +15.94% for VOO, so SLYG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), SLYG annualized +10.94% vs +13.34% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SLYG or VOO?
SLYG has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SLYG -43.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SLYG and VOO?
SLYG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLYG or VOO?
SLYG yields 0.67% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SLYG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SLYG led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SLYG is less concentrated, with 9.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.