SMCX vs VTI
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SMCI ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SMCX | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.43% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $261M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.61% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 12 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -51.97% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | -80.13% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 182.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 21, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
SMCX vs VTI Performance
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SMCI ETF (SMCX) is a ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SMCX returned -80.13% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, SMCX is down 51.97% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SMCX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 182.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.2% for SMCX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SMCX charges 1.43% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $143 vs $3 annually, a gap of $140 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SMCX currently yields 6.61% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SMCX and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2790 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SMCX or VTI?
SMCX has an expense ratio of 1.43% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $140 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SMCX or VTI?
Over the past year SMCX returned -80.13% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SMCX annualized -87.07% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SMCX or VTI?
SMCX has been the more volatile fund at 182.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SMCX -99.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SMCX and VTI?
SMCX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SMCX and VTI?
SMCX and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2790 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SMCX or VTI?
SMCX yields 6.61% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SMCX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.