SMCZ vs VOO
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SMCZ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 16.30% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -93.45% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | -92.04% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 174.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -98.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SMCZ vs VOO Performance
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) is a ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SMCZ returned -92.04% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, SMCZ is down 93.45% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SMCZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 174.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -98.5% for SMCZ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SMCZ charges 1.29% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $129 vs $3 annually, a gap of $126 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SMCZ currently yields 16.30% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SMCZ and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SMCZ or VOO?
SMCZ has an expense ratio of 1.29% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $126 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SMCZ or VOO?
Over the past year SMCZ returned -92.04% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), SMCZ annualized -93.51% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SMCZ or VOO?
SMCZ has been the more volatile fund at 174.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SMCZ -98.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SMCZ and VOO?
SMCZ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SMCZ and VOO?
SMCZ and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SMCZ or VOO?
SMCZ yields 16.30% while VOO yields 1.08%, so SMCZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.