SMDV vs VOO
Proshares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SMDV or VOO?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SMDV is less concentrated, with 12.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SMDV | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $709M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.32% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 101 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +10.38% | +13.31%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.20% | +17.07%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.58% | +22.72%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.90% | +13.19%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 15.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.1%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,319 | $18,580Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 12.1%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2015 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 5, 2015 to Sep 23, 2026 (11.6 years).
SMDV vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.6 years both funds cover.
SMDV vs VOO Performance
Proshares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SMDV returned +9.20% while VOO returned +17.07%. Year to date, SMDV is up 10.38% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.
Over three years, SMDV compounded at +10.58% per year against +22.72% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +5.90% and +13.19% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +12.77% annualized vs +7.50%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SMDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 15.0% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.1% for SMDV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SMDV charges 0.40% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SMDV currently yields 2.32% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
0.8% of SMDV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.2% of VOO's money is in holdings SMDV also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 97 positions we hold weights for in SMDV and 494 in VOO, against full books of 101 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 97 and 494 positions we hold weights for.
VOO holds 486 positions SMDV does not, 99.0% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.55%, AAPL 7.05%, MSFT 5.36%, AMZN 4.13%, GOOGL 3.24%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SMDV | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 0.78% | 0.16% | 0.62% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SMDV and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SMDV or VOO?
SMDV has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SMDV or VOO?
Over the past year SMDV returned +9.20% vs +17.07% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), SMDV annualized +7.50% vs +12.77% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SMDV or VOO?
SMDV has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 15.0% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SMDV -34.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SMDV and VOO?
SMDV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SMDV or VOO?
SMDV yields 2.32% while VOO yields 1.04%, so SMDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SMDV?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SMDV is less concentrated, with 12.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.