SMIN vs VOO
iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SMIN | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $750M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 467 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +2.20% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.57% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.95% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.21% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -60.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 8, 2012 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SMIN vs VOO Performance
iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SMIN returned +1.57% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, SMIN is up 2.20% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, SMIN compounded at +8.95% per year against +21.47% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +7.21% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +8.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SMIN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.5% for SMIN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SMIN charges 0.74% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $3 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SMIN currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SMIN and VOO share 0 holdings out of 963 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SMIN or VOO?
SMIN has an expense ratio of 0.74% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SMIN or VOO?
Over the past year SMIN returned +1.57% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SMIN annualized +8.94% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SMIN or VOO?
SMIN has been the more volatile fund at 26.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SMIN -60.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SMIN and VOO?
SMIN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SMIN and VOO?
SMIN and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 963 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SMIN or VOO?
SMIN yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.