SNOV vs VTI

SNOV vs VTI

Which is better, SNOV or VTI?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSNOVVTI
Expense Ratio0.90%0.03%Best
AUM$113M$690.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings103,524
YTD Return+10.52%+13.35%Best
1Y Return+10.24%+15.92%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.41%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.83%
Volatility (annualized)8.1%Best11.9%
Max Drawdown-15.4%Best-19.3%
$10,000 over 2.9 years$13,730$17,586Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 17, 2023May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 20, 2023 to Oct 2, 2026 (2.9 years).

SNOV vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.

SNOV vs VTI Performance

FT Vest US Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - November (SNOV) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SNOV returned +10.24% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, SNOV is up 10.52% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 8.1% for SNOV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.4% for SNOV and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SNOV charges 0.90% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SNOV currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of SNOV and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

SNOVVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SNOV or VTI?

SNOV has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $87 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, SNOV or VTI?

Over the past year SNOV returned +10.24% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, SNOV or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 8.1% for SNOV. Worst drawdown: SNOV -15.4% vs VTI -19.3%.

Should I hold both SNOV and VTI?

SNOV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, SNOV or VTI?

SNOV yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than SNOV?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.